February 27, 2007

The Sky's No Limit: Be A Dreamer

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

[I was reading an essay by Jeanne Tessier Barone and felt that what she writes merits being published here.  She and I think alike; in fact, to some extent, she could be another me.  I have taken the liberty of adapting the content to my life and changing things to apply to me, and perhaps also changing parts of the writing and so the essay is not as the original, but her basic ideas and thought processes are there, which I wanted to give her credit for, especially, her style of posing questions and then answering them, which I have learned a lot from.]

A short while back, I read something the poet Rita Dove once wrote:  "When the sky's the limit, how can you tell when you've gone too far?"  That seems a bit hemmed in when your head is full of far-flung metaphors, like mine often is.  That quote makes me feel contained, constrained by what struck me at first as a somewhat negative statement or idea: "When the sky's the limit, how can you tell when you've gone too far?"

But if you know anything about me, I love a challenge and living on the edge, so I pondered the quote awhile. You should know, by the way, that I have spent most of my life testing limits, my own and those imposed on me.  I am a born questioner and limit-tester, so much so that I just can't hold it inside and often blurt out my questions - not meaning to cause dissention or disharmony -  but with a desire to discuss… and well, test limits.  At school and at the University, my teachers dispaired.  As a child, I tested everything, even at the young age of two, when I nearly burned myself to death… After many operations and years in and out of the hospital, I started school, and became a dare-devil on wheels at age five, and whomever dared to challenge me got a match they would not soon forget - a small stick of a child, outwardly extremely feminine, but inwardly - a warrior!

So, faced with this limiting quote, this wrinkle in thought, I responded as any good questioner and limit-tester would; I went looking for answers to the questions that quote stirred up in me.  Sure enough, when I was done, I was grateful for the question that I once thought was a wrinkle in thought - some seriously faulty thinking.

The questions that came up were:

"Who says the sky's the limit, anyway?"

"And, it is really the limit, or do we just think so?"

"And, how can we know a limit is truly a limit unless we test its edges with all our might?"

"And isn't it just as important or more so to know when we haven't gone far enough?"

"And what does it mean to go to far anyway?"

So who says the sky's the limit, anyway?  This phrase comes from a contemporary of Shakespeare, a Spaniard named Miquel de Cervantes.  I was delighted to learn of this because this meant that the saying was not meant to impose limits, but to challenge and push against them.  The original phrase was by Cervantes was this: "No limits but the sky."  I find that an oddly more positive phrase than how it now appears in modern usage "The sky's the limit."  The phrase appeared in a novel by Don Quixote, which was first published about 1605.  The timeless story of DonQuixote was made into a Broadway musical called Man of La Mancha about 40 years ago, with a song, famous at the time, called, "To Dream the Impossible Dream." Maybe you've heard of it?

Don Quixote was a man who saw a world beyond the limits the world itself sought to impose.  In himself, an aging eccentric, he saw a brave knight errant seeking to rid the wrold of that which caused others harm.  In a foolish and ignorant barber, he saw a brave companion for his quest. In a depised and self-despising prositute, he saw a beautiful woman waiting to be cherished. Don Quixote was a man without limits, who looked beyond what others called impossible and found rich and joyous possibilities.  All those he encountered thought him mad; an unknowing fool.

So, in answer to the question: "Who said the sky's the limit anyway?" The answer is: A writer who sought to create a world seen through kinder and more redeeming eyes. about 400 years ago.  At that time, of course, the sky had not yet been pierced through by rocket ships, probed by satellites, travelled across in metal birds by you and I, and studied in all its glorious and infinte detail by a massive telescope travelling through space.

The sky, rather, is limitless in possibilities and is defined as:  "The expanse of air over a given point on Earth: the upper atmosphere." The sky, in other words, is nothing more than the air we breathe, and an illusion created by a certain lanlocked point of view.

Another writer, from the 1800s (Authur Schopenhauer) said that  "Everyone takes the limits of her own field of vision for the limits of the world." We see the blue above and nothing beyond and we assume the sky's the limit. We see a structure, an institution, an attitude, a habit of being, and we assume it must be and always be so.

In the field of Communications, the power of self-fulfilling prophecies are taught: that human beings tend to enact or make real what they believe about themselves and others.  One woman believes that, discrimination or not, gender and cultural barriers or not, there is still no limit to what she can attain if she pursues her goals with all her heart.

Another believes her world is a closed system in which women are hopelessly shut out and disenfranchised, and so have always been.  The first woman builds a life of accomplishment with dignity and grace; the second woman builds a life of bitterness, recrimination, narrowness.  (My feminine language applies to all people.)

So now we have an answer to the second question: Is the sky the limit, or do we just think so?  We think it so.  We are bound at every turn by the limits of our beliefs. They define what we think is real and what we ourselves will become. So we had best be careful, then, about what we believe.  We had best create and hold beliefs that leave as much room as possible for us to be wrong, for us to expand and grow.  We had best build worlds for ourselves that have few walls, and many windows and doors.

Are there no real limits in our lives, then?  Aren't there limits we cannot change simply by believing? Of course there are. some persons struggle with terrible poverty. Some are differently abled in ways that make everyday life tasks difficult. Some carry burdens of abuse and experience that others will never know.  Limits abound, but it is more how we think about them than what they are that will determine the quality of our lives. Writers Dominquez and Robin have said: "Once we're above survival level, the difference between prosperity and poverty lies simply in our degree of gratitude."

The third question facing us, then, is:  How can we know our limits unless we test them?  Here the answer is straightforward and simple: We can't.  It is only through testing and pushing against the limits of our perceptions, experiences and culture that we can be a force for change; change our own circumstances and those of others. If we didn't test our limits, we would never walk, we would never grow, we would never fly.

So, the sky is not limits but endless possibilities, and it is we who perceive and impose limits where none exist, and if we do not test the limits of our perceptions and our abilities and our worlds, we will never know what lies beyond.

But now we have arrived at our fourth question:  How do we know when we haven't gone far enough?  Most of us are committed, hard-working people, aren't we? Isn't that far enough to go? No. How do we know, then, if we need to go farther? Here are some conclusions I've  come to in my own search for an answer to this question:

If we do not engage in work for which we have a real passion and pursue our work passionately, we have not gone far enough.  If we do not have a clear sense of direction and meaning in our lives, we have not gone far enough.

If we do not understand that our actions and words can have a lasting impact on the quality of human life, we have not gone far enough.  If we don't hope and strive to make a positive difference in our world, if we are content with what we do and don't continually look to how we can be better persons, we are not going far enough.

If we haven't wholly loved another human being, if we don't at least try to recognize the good in everyone we meet, if we don't have times of real joy in our lives, then we have not gone far enough.

Life is too short  and too precious not to live it with passion and pursue it with zeal. And your work is much too important to pursue with anything less than your total commitment.

And now we come to our last question:  "What does it mean to go to far"  I am sure we all remember when "going too far" meant having sex before marriage and I think we all know it doesn't mean that anymore.  So what does it mean?

Have we gone too far if we try something new that fails?  No.

On the contrary, if we never fail, we can't be sure we aren't going far enough.  Have we gone too far if we try to re-envision our work, our organizations, our goals, our dreams? No. All change, all innovation, beings with re-imagining.  Is it going too far to take important risks? No. We have to be willing to risk for the sake of movement and growth.   Is it going too far to stand up and speak out about what you believe, even if your ideas are unpopular? No. The human story would be a slow and sad one if there had not been individuals all along the way who spoke out against the status quo and called their peers to be better than they were.  Is it going too far to remain a committed idealist in a world that invites pessimism? Never. Without ideals we die.

Can we ever really go too far?  This is a difficult question for me because I have already admitted that I am a life-long edge tester and there's a part of me that always wants to say that you can never go too far. Even my current decent into deep middle age hasn't deterred me from, often, heading out on metaphorical tight wires without benefit of nets.  But I have also sometimes fallen hard onto the floor below. So with exhilerating experiences and occasional bruises to show for it, here is what I would say about going too far.

First, take big risks and important actions, but give them careful thought. Also make sure a part of the thinking process includes sharing your ideas with someone whose opinion on these matters you respect, because we human beings are expertly capable of having blind spots in our thinking and of deceiving ourselves.

Second, try not to go so far that, when you arrive at your destination, you find yourself utterly alone.  It is hard to be a limit-tester, a risk-taker, a traveller into new terrain.  Seek and maintain the support of someone who loves you.

Third, be aware that change involves loss as well as opportunity.  You can't leave one job for another without surrendering the comforts and sometimes the friendships of where you were.  You can't take on new responsibilities without letting go of old ones. Not for long anyway, or you will be of no use to anyone, including yourself.  You can't launch new programs without sacrificing some aspects of what's already being done.  You have to make enough room in your life and work for growth to occur.

Fourth, be ready to feel afraid.  All change is scary.  It is human to love a rut; ruts are comfortable and safe.  There are many ways in which most of us would prefer the predictable to the uncertain or unknown.  This is why, for example, when change occurs in organizations, it is often met with resentment or anger.  This is why: "That isn't how it's done" and "but we've always done it this way" are such well-known phrases.  Change requires that we rethink old ideas, and there is nothing scarier than giving up what we were convinced were truths about our work, ourselves, our world. But, you know, fear is also enlivening, which is why people skydive and bungee jump and scale sheer mountain cliffs.  And it is good to feel fully alive.

Fifth, dare to dream. Let your mind wander. Rita Dove has a poem called "Daystar" in which she describes a woman who takes a chair out behind her garage to stare at an empty field while her children are napping.  When her daughter finds her and demands to know what her mother has been doing out there, the mother responds, "Why, building a palace."  We should build palaces in our minds.

Can we go too far?  Maybe, but there are things to learn from it that we can't learn any other way, and even when I've sometimes thought I'd done it - gone too far - I've never regretted it for long.

I have no idea what Rita Dove had in mind when she wrote the words we began with: "When the sky's the limit, how can you tell you've gone too far?" But I do know where my attempt to address her question has taken me. By way of conclusion, and in humble tribute to her poetry, let me end this way:

The sky is infinite.  It is we who make it a wall.  The only way to know is: go.

Standing still is death.  And far is never where you are, but where you dream to be. Everything good in life was born in dreams.

Be a dreamer.

Spread the word

del.icio.us Digg Furl Reddit Ask BlinkList blogmarks BUMPzee Blogg-Buzz Google Ma.gnolia muti Netscape Newsvine PlugIM ppnow Rojo Shadows Simpy Slashdot Socializer Sphere Spurl StumbleUpon Tailrank Technorati Windows Live Wists Yahoo! Help

Permalink • Print • 3 Comments

April 17, 2008

The Art of Letting Bad Things Happen

Hi - found this great article in Early To Rise - read and get wise!

By Tim Ferriss

I just landed back in CA from a long overdue mini-retirement through London, Scotland, Sardinia, Slovak Republic, Austria, Amsterdam, and Japan.

Some unpleasant surprises awaited me when I checked in on the evil e-mail inbox. Why?

I let them happen.

I always do.

Here are just a few of the goodies that awaited me this time:

  • One of our fulfillment companies has been shut down due to the president's death, causing a 20%+ loss in monthly orders and requiring an emergency shift of all Web design and order processing.
  • Missed radio and magazine appearances and upset would-be interviewers.
  • More than a dozen lost joint-venture partnership opportunities.

It's not that I go out of my way to irritate people - not at all - but I recognize one critical fact: Oftentimes, in order to do the big things, you have to let the small bad things happen. This is a skill we want to cultivate.

What did I get in exchange for temporarily putting on blinders and taking a few glancing blows?

  • I followed the Rugby World Cup in Europe and was able to watch the New Zealand All Blacks live, a dream I've had for the last 5 years.
  • I was able to shoot every gun I've ever dreamed of firing since brainwashing myself with Commando. Bless the Slovak Republic and their paramilitaries.
  • I was able to film a television series pilot in Japan, a lifelong dream and the most fun I've had in months, if not years.
  • I met with my Japanese publisher, Seishisha (Tel: 03-5574-8511) and had media interviews in Tokyo, where The 4-Hour Workweek is now #1 in several of the largest chains.
  • I took a complete 10-day media fast and felt like I'd had a two-year vacation from computers.
  • I attended the Tokyo International Film Festival and hung out with one of my heroes, the producer of the Planet Earth television series.

Once you realize that you can turn off the noise without the world ending, you're liberated in a way that few people ever know.

Just remember: If you don't have attention, you don't have time. Did I have time to check e-mail and voicemail? Sure. It might take 10 minutes. Did I have the attention to risk fishing for crises in those 10 minutes? Not at all.

As tempting as it is to "just check e-mail for one minute," I didn't do it. I know from experience that any problem found in the inbox will linger on the brain for hours or days after you shut down the computer, rendering "free time" useless with preoccupation. It's the worst of states, where you experience neither relaxation nor productivity. Be focused on work or focused on something else, never in between.

Time without attention is worthless, so value attention over time.

Here are a few questions that can help you put on the productivity blinders and put things in perspective. Even when you're not traveling the world, develop the habit of letting small bad things happen. If you don't, you'll never find time for the life-changing big things, whether important tasks or true peak experiences. If you do force the time but puncture it with distractions, you won't have the attention to appreciate it.

  • What is the one goal, if completed, that could change everything?
  • What is the most urgent thing right now that you feel you "must" or "should" do?
  • Can you let the urgent "fail" - even for a day - to get to the next milestone with your potential life-changing tasks?
  • What's been on your "to-do" list the longest? Start it first thing in the morning and don't allow interruptions or lunch until you finish.

Will "bad" things happen? Small problems will crop up, yes. A few people will complain and quickly get over it. BUT, the bigger picture items you complete will let you see these for what they are - minutiae and repairable hiccups.

Make this trade a habit. Let the small bad things happen and make the big good things happen.

[Ed. Note: Timothy Ferriss is author of the #1 New York Times best-seller, The 4-Hour Workweek. He is the world's top lifestyle blogger - more than 20 million hits per month - at www.fourhourworkweek.com/blog, which details all of his latest experiments and how-to case studies.]

 

 

Spread the word

del.icio.us Digg Furl Reddit Ask BlinkList blogmarks BUMPzee Blogg-Buzz Google Ma.gnolia muti Netscape Newsvine PlugIM ppnow Rojo Shadows Simpy Slashdot Socializer Sphere Spurl StumbleUpon Tailrank Technorati Windows Live Wists Yahoo! Help

Permalink • Print • Comment

March 19, 2008

The Google Quality Rater's Guidelines - Hoax or Real?

I recently received an email from Russell Wright from the Theme Zoom Team, who writes that the Google Quality Rater's document, which is found on the link below, was supposedly leaked from Google Secret Labs. It is supposedly used to train search engine "quality raters". Some experts hold the position that this document MAY be some sort of elaborate hoax, but that Search Engine Land is treating this document as if it is real and authentic.

It sure looks real to me… but I don't know if it really came from Google.

Read  what Search Engine Land writes about the document, which can be found here, and judge for yourself.

 ********************

Brian Ussery has discovered a revised copy of the Google Quality Raters Guidelines, which he archived on his own site (has been removed.  The pdf can be found on this site).

The documents are used by Google Quality Raters to aid them in classifying queries, measuring relevancy, and rating the search results. To do so, the Quality Rater must understand how Google works and this document has a bunch of that. Let me pull out some of those details in easy to read bullet points.

Three Query Types:

  • Navigational: someone searching for a site, such as a search for IBM.
  • Informational: someone searching for information on a topic of interest, such as finding out more information on Danny Sullivan.
  • Transactional: someone searching when seeking to purchase something either online or offline, such as searching for 'buy ipod touch.'

Quality Rating Scales:

  • Vital: This is the highest score a web page can receive for a query. A vital result comes from a query that is most likely navigational and the resulting page is the official web page of the query. When searching for 'ibm', the vital result would be www.ibm.com.
  • Useful: This is the second highest score a web page can receive for a given query. A useful rating should be assigned to results that "answer the query just right; they are neither too broad nor too specific." One of the examples given for a useful rating would be a search on meningitis symptoms with a resulting web page of http://www.webmd.com/hw/infection/aa34586.asp
  • Relevant: This comes after a useful rating, and is used for results that return less useful results. The guidelines say the result is often "less comprehensive, come from a less authoritative source, or cover only one important aspect of the query." An example would be a review of laptop computers, but the review only takes five computers and not all computers within its class. Since it is not a fully comprehensive review, it would be rated as relevant and not useful.
  • Not Relevant: This rating is used for pages that are not helpful to the query but are somewhat still connected to the original query. Classifications of a not relevant page would be "outdated, too narrowly regional, too specific, too broad" and so on. One of the examples give is a search for the 'BBC' that returns a specific article from BBS; it is too specific and is not relevant to the query at hand.
  • Off-Topic: This is the lowest rating a page can receive for a query. If the returned page is completely not relevant to the query, it would be given a rating of "off topic." An example given is a query on 'hot dogs' that returns a page about doghouses.

Categories For Results That Can't Be Rated:
Not everything can be rated, and those must be classified somehow. The categories for those types of results include:

  • Didn’t Load: For pages that return a 404 error, page not found, product not found, server time out, 403 forbidden, login required, and so on.
  • Foreign Language: This is given to a page that is in a "foreign language" to the "target language" of the query. English is never a foreign language, no matter what. So, if you search in Chinese for something and a Hebrew page is returned, it is a foreign language, but if an English page is returned, it is not a foreign language. There are exceptions to the rule.
  • Unratable: When the rater cannot rate it for any other reason.

Spam Labels:
Now for the really good stuff, spam labels. This is a new addition to the quality raters guidelines and is fairly small. The labels include:

  • Not Spam: The not spam rating is given to pages that "has not been designed using deceitful web design techniques."
  • Maybe Spam: This label is given when you feel the page is "spammy," but you are not 100% convinced of that.
  • Spam: Given to pages you feel are violating Google's webmaster guidelines.

Flags:
Flags are for pages that require immediate attention, such as:

  • Pornographic content
  • Malicious code on pages

That is a brief overview of some of the many points in the document. For more, see the archived document and for some history, check out Google Blogoscoped.

 

/Angela Wickenberg

Spread the word

del.icio.us Digg Furl Reddit Ask BlinkList blogmarks BUMPzee Blogg-Buzz Google Ma.gnolia muti Netscape Newsvine PlugIM ppnow Rojo Shadows Simpy Slashdot Socializer Sphere Spurl StumbleUpon Tailrank Technorati Windows Live Wists Yahoo! Help

Permalink • Print • Comment

Google Quality Rater's Guidelines - Entire Document

Spread the word

del.icio.us Digg Furl Reddit Ask BlinkList blogmarks BUMPzee Blogg-Buzz Google Ma.gnolia muti Netscape Newsvine PlugIM ppnow Rojo Shadows Simpy Slashdot Socializer Sphere Spurl StumbleUpon Tailrank Technorati Windows Live Wists Yahoo! Help

Permalink • Print • Comment

July 4, 2007

Independence Day, Freedom, and My Birthday - The Fourth of July and Free Gift!

In the States, where I'm from, it's Independence Day, the National holiday is commonly associated with  fireworks, parades, barbecues, picnics,
baseball games, and various other public and private events celebrating the history, government, and traditions of the United States.   Fireworks have been associated with independence day since 1777, with a 13 gun salute at daybreak and night fall.

It's also my birthday today.  I was born, though, after all "bombs had burst in the air" -  the noise had stopped and all was peaceful, at 11.25 PM on the Fourth of July.  Here's a video of a song composed and sung by another person, also born on the Fouth of July. Press play and then pause to let it load and while it's loading come back and read the rest of this post and download your gift:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=vnRqYMTpXHc  This the link to the URL where the song is.

One of my dreams is to become Independent  - financially independent so that I will have even more freedom to do the things I want to do.  Living a life of freedom is a dream of many people.   I know I began with Internet Marketing because of the freedoms it promises.

Even my life as it is right now is full of fantastic freedoms:

  • I live in a residential area most people only dream of.
  • I work from home, where I have a lovely patio and garden.
  • I spend time with my children, taking breaks when needed;  I can prepare the bar-be-que as I sit at my computer.
  • Even though I work with a very tight budget, I am able to run a business and have this fantastic blog in SemioLogic Pro (see bottom of page).
  • I am able to communicate with people all over the world and take part in seminars for free or at a fraction of the real cost.
  • And my successes are completely dependent on the things that I do; the decisions that I make and the focused ACTION THAT I TAKE.


The list could be longer, but I want to get to the point here, which is living the life of your dreams and gaining the freedom and independence that you want and deserve.  There is nothing more important in life than this.  In this blog, I have tried to give you many different alternatives and ideas of how you could change your life and improve your work situation.  At times I have tried to inspire you.   Sometimes I have given you tips and free tools.  Have you been reading?

Are you independent?  Are you living the life of your dreams?

A little birthday advice I'm giving.  I have a lot of experience from this one point, so listen closely, please:

Don't let possible amazing life opportunities pass you by because you were afraid that you weren't going to do good…or be embarrassed or hurt.  Go for it to the best of your ability and let the cards fall where they may.


At this point, I want to share an inspiring video from someone who has attained financial freedom.  I know that he earns a reported $800,000 per month from Internet Marketing alone. I have personally met several marketers making this kind of money, so this is no fluke.  He shows his journey from when he first started with Internet Marketing, and how he has become so very successful.  His name is Mike Filsaime, and he has made a video that lets you peek inside of his business.  Thanks, Mike for sharing this.

https://paydotcom.com/r/15727/Gaiaangel/

I was both inspired and somewhat  envious  of his laser-sharp road to success!  While I've been fooling around on the Internet, he was making some major progress!!!  Soon, he will be releasing the DVD's from his $5,000 seminar held earlier this year.  The DVDs are called "7 Figure Code", which stands for earning a seven figure income in this field; learning to run your own 7-Figure business. The video is free so take a look!

https://paydotcom.com/r/15727/Gaiaangel/

Since it's my birthday, I want to give you something more!  Here's a piece of software that has a $97 value and will help you in your Web 2.0 marketing efforts.

http://edwinsoft.com/bumbum.zip

It searches available Squidoo lenses and Hubpages based on your keywords, checks Yahoo for link popularity and checks Google if Squidoo/Hubpages is ranked in the top ten for the particular keyword.

And if you want to learn more about Web 2.0 marketing, or even if  you don't know squat about it, or especally if you don't know what in the world I am talking about, click on the link below to get a free ebook from one of the world's top experts in the field, Jack Humprey.  It's called The Authority Black Book, it's a $197 value, but you can put your wallet away because it's free:  Just click on this link.  This is the best read I have had this year!!

http://contentdesk.com/cmd.php?af=615874

Here in Sweden, on the Fourth of July, most people have already begun their "industrial" vacation or "holiday". "Industrial" because when it was decided years ago that the month of July was "vacation month", that's when most of the working population worked in the various industries here in Sweden. That is no longer a valid reason for vacationing in July, but habits and traditions die hard, don't they?  They travel to their quaint "stugas" small summer cottages in the woods and the archipelagos, they work on their homes and in their gardens, visit friends and family in distant cities, and whole families nowadays travel on chartered air tours to Southern Europe and many other parts of the world. Swedes love to travel and it is relatively inexpensive, too.  So lots of Swedes will have been out of the country between one and several weeks during the summer months, especially.  The average Swede is willing to save a lot just for the privilege of travel - perhaps an inheritance from the Vikings?

In Sweden, it's mid-day now, and  the streets of the residential area where I live are bare; hardly any cars or people are to be seen, no kids are out playing and no people are out on walks, and most of the boats have taken off for adventures in the bracken waters of the Baltic Sea.  The occasional boat comes into the harbor to refill provisions and re-tank water. There's a small restaurant where a few people are eating or some people from town come out to get some ice-cream.  The beach is deserted and the walk in the woods, normally where so many people are jogging or walking, is isolated.  It's quiet.  I think I'll take a walk there now…

Happy Fourth of July!

Angela Wickenberg

P.S.  This website and blog will go through some major changes soon.  Stay tuned and enjoy your gifts!!!

Spread the word

del.icio.us Digg Furl Reddit Ask BlinkList blogmarks BUMPzee Blogg-Buzz Google Ma.gnolia muti Netscape Newsvine PlugIM ppnow Rojo Shadows Simpy Slashdot Socializer Sphere Spurl StumbleUpon Tailrank Technorati Windows Live Wists Yahoo! Help

Permalink • Print • Comment

December 31, 2006

What's Love Got To Do With It? On Listening to, Loving, and Understanding Your Customers

by Angela Wickenberg


We typically seek first to be understood; mostly, we do not listen with the
intent to understand, we listen with the intent to reply.  We are either
speaking, or preparing to speak, filtering everything through our own eyeglasses
and reading our life stories into other people’s lives.  

“I know exactly how you feel - let me tell you about my experience“ - constantly
projecting our own movies onto other people’s behaviour.  If we have a problem
with someone - then that person just doesn’t understand.  Sound familiar?  But
to understand another person, you have to listen to them, understand them.  We
are so filled with our own rightness, our own stories.  I’m guilty of it too.

More

Spread the word

del.icio.us Digg Furl Reddit Ask BlinkList blogmarks BUMPzee Blogg-Buzz Google Ma.gnolia muti Netscape Newsvine PlugIM ppnow Rojo Shadows Simpy Slashdot Socializer Sphere Spurl StumbleUpon Tailrank Technorati Windows Live Wists Yahoo! Help

Permalink • Print